Every facility.
One dashboard.

“Anything over our threshold has to go out to tender. Can you even quote us directly?”

We work either way. Below your municipality's direct-engagement limit we can quote and proceed; above it, we expect to respond to a posted RFP like anybody else, and we are equally willing to provide a specification your purchasing department can put out to competitive bid without our name on it. We will tell you plainly which category we think your scope falls into rather than splitting a project to keep it under a threshold, because that is the kind of thing that ends up in an audit.

“Our capital budget is set in the fall for next year. Nothing happens outside of that.”

Understood, and it shapes how we work with you. The assessment and the written scope are the deliverables that matter in the fall, because that is what your report to council needs — scope, cost, phasing and what the risk is if it is deferred. Work usually starts well after the approval. If something genuinely cannot wait until the next cycle, we would rather help you scope a small operating-budget measure at that one site than pretend an urgent capital request is easy to get through.

“This will be on a public agenda. How do we explain cameras on municipal buildings?”

By being specific about where they point and why, and by having the policy written before the vote rather than after. In practice that means coverage of yards, equipment, fuel, entrances and parking areas; signage at every approach; a stated retention period; and a named staff role who can release footage and on what grounds. Residents object far less to a camera on a salt dome than to a vague security program with no documented limits, and the report reads better when the limits are part of the proposal.

“If someone requests the footage or the access logs, do we have to hand them over?”

That is a question for your clerk and your privacy lead, and we build the system so their answer is straightforward rather than assuming it for them. What we provide is the technical side they need in order to decide: what is recorded, where, for how long, who has viewing rights, and an export that can be redacted. We confirm retention and access rules with your municipality before commissioning, and we put them in the operating documentation so the next director does not have to reconstruct them.

“We have forty buildings and enough money for about six. Where do we start?”

With incident history and asset value, not with the buildings that are most visible. In most municipalities that puts the operations yard first, then any site storing fuel, tools or copper, then facilities with a documented after-hours damage record. If your works yard is the whole exposure and everything else is a parking-lot debate, our recommendation will be to spend the entire allocation on the yard and leave the town hall alone this cycle. A thin layer across forty sites is the version that gets criticized later.

“Our hall is rented to community groups every weekend. We cannot badge every volunteer.”

You should not try. Permit holders are better handled with codes issued per booking that expire when the booking does, so nobody accumulates a key over three seasons of running a program. The credentialled side is for staff and contractors. That split also makes damage conversations far simpler, because when a hall is found damaged on Sunday morning, the record shows which permit window was open rather than putting your facility staff in the position of accusing a resident group without evidence.